BEHIND MELISSA ROXAS’ ALLEGATIONS
Fil-American activist-Melissa Roxas decides to show-up in court on July 30, after disregarding the other two SC hearings on her filed writ of amparo against the AFP last June.
Chronology of Events
Roxas claimed that she along with two other colleagues identified as Edward Jandoc and Juan Carabeo were abducted by eight hooded abductors last May 19 in Lapaz, Tarlac.
Motive behind said incident, as claimed by BAYAN Muna, was presumably her supposed affiliations with the Communist Party of the Philippines.
Other than suffering from illegal arrest and detention, Roxas also claimed having been subjected to incessant torture, interrogation and assault for almost a week.
On May 25 2009, Roxas asserted that her captors released her in exchange of her silence; publicly divulging said incident would mean her “death”.
But in a day’s length, Roxas had her public “debut” regarding said abduction in the country’s dailies.
She even filed a petition for the issuance of writ of amparo before the Supreme Court against the members of the Philippine Army 7th Infantry Division in Tarlac last May 28th.
However, Roxas stood-up the first inquiry on her case last June 29 after she chose to leave right after filing her complaints.
Things that Don’t Add-up on Roxas’ Alibi
Why she was not killed in the first place?
If Roxas’ captors were true to their intents of “silencing” her, why would they be “generous” enough to set her loose?
Why let Roxas live in the first place; particularly when there is no guarantee of her continued “silence” on the matter? These good-for-nothing goons even gave her the opportunity to seek courts’ refuge on her case.
The captors could have easily gotten away with a perfect crime by burying all other material evidence including their very victims-Roxas and others.
Besides, no one could perfectly attest to said crime other than Roxas herself. Besides Roxas, there are no other substantive witnesses to said incident.
How was Roxas able to identify her Captors?
Synthesizing the instance of said abduction; Roxas attested that her captors wore hoods or bonnets by the time she was taken in La Paz. There is not a slightest possibility that Roxas could have had the opportunity of identifying them.
With the rationale Roxas had on who her captors were, it is obvious that she pointed-out militants’ “usual suspects” or the military.
Frankly speaking, by the time Roxas claimed she was abducted by members of the AFP the public could not help but speculate on whether she is in fact a member of the New People’s Army.
If Roxas was indeed a mere civilian, her basic instincts would have led her to conclude a long-list of possible suspects other than narrowing it down to the AFP. Only the terrorist-secessionist and the Communist groups in the country consider the AFP as their adversary. Hence, as Roxas claimed them her enemy; she had also claimed being affiliated with either of said threat groups.
What do Roxas mean with her claimed “exposure” mission?
Else, why don’t Roxas define her claimed “exposure” mission in toto to the public? What was she exposing herself to?
Exposure missions, as known to most college activists are their “ascension” to the Communist underground. This way, they engrossed themselves to the bigger picture of the NPA’s way of life and struggle.
This is not something Roxas could utterly deny when she is in front of renowned academe intellectuals.
Roxas’ affiliations precede her iconic nature. She is first and foremost an activist who is surrounded by identified militants and NPA ranking-leaders in the country. “Tell me who your friends are, and I’ll tell who you are?”
In fact, Juanito CARABEO was a known NPA member in Bataan. Civilian witnesses identified his participation during the NPA-led harassment of Orani Town Hall located Orani, Bataan in 2004.
CARABEO has three (3) standing warrants of arrest issued under CC Nr 11125 for murder by Judge Manuel Tan of RTC Br-2 dated (Feb. 01, 2008); CC Nr 11137 for rebellion/insurrection by Judge Manuel Tan of RTC Br-2 dtd (Feb. 18, 2008); and, CC Nr 11149 for rebellion/insurrection (Feb 15, 2008).
Furthermore, John Edward JANDOC is also an active member of CLRC-Bataan. In addition, JANDOC was the son of NPA leaders-Ana JANDOC and Finance Officer of Nueva Ecija NPA -Provincial Command- Hilario GUIO.
Truth as Claimed by Roxas’ Fellow Cadre
According to factionalized group of Tiamzon-sympathizers in Southern Luzon, particularly the NPA’s Central Luzon Regional Committee (CLRC) asserts that Roxas was staged-managed by Bayan Muna leaders to insinuate a controversy where Satur Ocampo, Teddy Casiño and Liza Masa could end-up like “heroes”.
To draw media and public support for their early 2010 senatorial candidacy the three are practically tying their names on every issue that sell.
No comments:
Post a Comment